top of page
Search

_

  • Writer: Blog
    Blog
  • 2 days ago
  • 4 min read


Learning and teaching are not the same thing, and that distinction changes everything.



💡 Introduction: Why Learning Matters More Than Teaching


In my role supporting teachers and adult learners in correctional education, I have come to recognize a critical distinction: teaching does not guarantee learning. In environments where instructional time is limited, and outcomes are high-stakes, such as preparing students for the GED, this distinction becomes even more significant.


My philosophy centers on the belief that learning should be intentional, engaging, and meaningful. Rather than viewing myself as someone who delivers content, I see my role as designing experiences that make learning possible. This perspective aligns with Dwayne Harapnuik’s emphasis on creating significant learning environments that prioritize learner ownership and authentic engagement (Harapnuik, n.d.-a).


✨ Key Shift


Teaching = delivering content

Learning = designing experiences


🧠 Beliefs About Learning


I believe that learning is an active and constructive process, not a passive one. Learners must engage with content, make connections, and reflect on their understanding in order for meaningful learning to occur. This belief is grounded in constructivist theory, which suggests that individuals build knowledge through experience rather than simply receiving information (Piaget, 1952).


In correctional education settings, this approach is especially important. Many learners have experienced previous academic challenges or disengagement. As a result, learning must feel relevant, attainable, and empowering.


What I Believe About Learning:

✔ Learning is active, not passive

✔ Learning must be meaningful and relevant

✔ Learning requires ownership and reflection

✔ Learning thrives in safe, supportive environments


🔄 Teaching vs. Learning: A Necessary Shift


Traditional models of education often prioritize teaching as the delivery of content. However, this approach frequently results in surface-level understanding rather than deep learning. Harapnuik (n.d.-a) emphasizes the importance of shifting toward facilitating learning rather than delivering instruction.


This shift requires moving from:

  • “How do I teach this?”

    to

  • “How do I create conditions where learning can occur?”


What This Shift Looks Like in Practice:


Traditional Teaching

  • Delivering content

  • Teacher-centered

  • Passive learning

  • One instructional method


Learning-Centered Approach

  • Designing experiences

  • Student-centered

  • Active engagement

  • Multiple pathways for learning


👩 Beliefs About Myself as a Learner


As a learner, I have discovered that I grow most when I am actively engaged in the learning process. I learn best through applying ideas, collaborating with others, and reflecting on my experiences.


My graduate coursework has reinforced the importance of iteration and continuous improvement. Learning is not a one-time event but an ongoing process of growth. This aligns with both constructivism and connectivism, where knowledge evolves through experience and connection (Siemens, 2005).


💛 What I’ve Learned About Myself:

  • I grow through doing, not just listening

  • I need space to reflect and refine

  • I learn best when I can apply ideas in meaningful ways


🧩 Theoretical Foundations of My Learning Philosophy


My philosophy is grounded in a blend of learning theories that support active, social, and connected learning.


Constructivism, rooted in the work of Jean Piaget, emphasizes that learners construct knowledge through experiences (Piaget, 1952).


Social constructivism, influenced by Lev Vygotsky, highlights the importance of collaboration and interaction in learning (Vygotsky, 1978).


Connectivism, introduced by George Siemens, emphasizes the role of technology and networks in modern learning (Siemens, 2005).


💡 In My Practice, This Looks Like:

  • Station rotation - Constructivist learning

  • Collaboration and discussion - Social constructivism

  • VR and digital tools - Connectivism


🚀 Connection to My Innovation Plan


My learning philosophy directly informs my innovation plan, which focuses on implementing blended learning through a station-rotation model in correctional education.


This model supports:

  • Student choice and ownership

  • Differentiated instruction

  • Active, hands-on learning experiences


Through the integration of instructional technology, including VR and interactive tools, I aim to create environments where learning is engaging, flexible, and meaningful.






🌍 My Role as a Change Agent


As an educational leader, my role extends beyond supporting instruction, I am responsible for influencing meaningful change. Transitioning from a teaching-centered approach to a learning-centered approach requires both mindset shifts and ongoing support.

I work to:

  • Support teachers in redesigning learning experiences

  • Provide training aligned with effective instructional strategies

  • Build relationships that foster trust and openness to change



“I am not just supporting instruction, I am helping shift how learning is experienced.”


🌱 Conclusion: A Commitment to Meaningful Learning


My learning philosophy is grounded in the belief that education should do more than deliver content, it should create experiences that lead to understanding, growth, and opportunity.


By focusing on learning rather than teaching, I aim to support environments where learners feel empowered, engaged, and capable of success. This philosophy will continue to evolve as I grow, but its foundation remains the same:


Learning that actually sticks is learning that matters.


References


Harapnuik, D. (n.d.-a). Learning philosophy. http://www.harapnuik.org/?page_id=95

This resource emphasizes focusing on learning rather than teaching and influenced my perspective on learner ownership.


Harapnuik, D. (n.d.-b). Educational development philosophy. http://www.harapnuik.org/?page_id=4639

This work highlights the importance of creating significant learning environments and meaningful engagement.


Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.

Supports the idea that learners construct knowledge through experience.


Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.

Emphasizes the role of social interaction in learning.


Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age.

Highlights the importance of networks and technology in modern learning.

 
 
 

Comments


©2018 by amberyoung. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page